Elizabeth. (1952)
Jevons, Meters. P., and you will Parker, Yards https://datingranking.net/cs/senior-match-recenze. T. (1964). J. din. Street., 17, 243-250. Lidwell, 0. Meters. (1959). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., 18,49-52. Real time, We., and you can Nichols, An effective. C. (1961).J. inject. Dis.,108, 195-204. Macdonald, Good. (1946). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., 5, 230-233. Meyer, W. (1966). Zentbl. Bukt. PurusitKde., I . Abt. Orig., 201,465-481. Meyer, W. (1967). J. Hyg., Camb., 65,439-447. Nakagawa, Yards. (1960). Jap. J. damp. Res., 8, 331-342. Oeding, P., and you may Williams, R. Elizabeth. 0. (1958). step three. Hyg., Cumb., 56, 445-454. Pagano, J. S., Farrer, S. M., Plotkin, S. A., Brachman, P. S., Fekety, F. R., and Pidcoe, V. (1960). Research, Letter.Y., 131, 927-928. Parker, M. T. (1966). For the “The brand new Scientific Basis out-of Medication Annual Opinion” (J. P. Ross, ed.), pp. 157-173. College out-of London area, New Athlone Drive, London. Parker, Meters. T., Todinson, Good. J. H., and you can Williams, Roentgen. Elizabeth. 0. (1955). J. Hyg., Cumb., 53,458-473.
The latest parasexual period as well as use in hereditary study
Pether, J. V. S. (1968).J. Hyg., C an effective d . , 66,605. Poole, P. Meters., and you may Baker, J. R. (1966). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., twenty five, 116-123. Declaration (1959). Int. Bull. bact. Nomencl.,nine, 115-118. Statement (1963). Int. Bull. bact. Nomencl., 13, 119-122. Declaration (1967). Int. Bull. buct. Nomencl., 17, 113-125. Report (1971). Int. Bull. syst. Buct., 21, 165, 167, 171. Rountree, P. Yards. (1959). J. gen. Microbiol., 20,620-633. Rountree, P. M., and Asheshov, Age. H. (1961). J. gen. Microbiol., twenty six, 111-122. Rountree, P. M., and you may Freeman, B. M. (1955). Med. J. Aust., dos, 157-161. Ruys, A. C., and you will Borst, J. (1959). Antonie wan Leeuwenhoek, 25, 237-240. Seto, J. T., and you will Wilson, J. B. (1958). Have always been.step 3. wet. Res., 19, 241-246. Smith, H. W. (1948a).J. Hyg., C u d . , 46,7681. Smith, H. W. (1948b);Jp. Street. Ther., 58, 179-188. Smith, H. W. (1954).J. Path. Buc
Tarr, H. A great. (1958). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., 17, 64-72. Watson, W. A great. (1965). Veterinarian. Rec., 77, 477-480. Wentworth, B., Romig, W. R., and you can Dixon, W. J. (1964). J. infect. Dis.,114, 179188.
Williams, Roentgen. Age. 0. (1957). Zentbl. Bakt. PurasitKde., We . Abt. Orig., 168, 528-532. Williams, R. E. O., and you may Jevons, Yards. P. (1961). Zentbl. Bukt. ParasitKde., We Abt. Orig., 181,349-358. Williams, R. Age. O., and you may Rippon, J. J. Hyg., Camb., 50, 320-353. Williams, Roentgen. E. O., Rippon, J. Elizabeth., and you may Dowsett, L. M. (1953). Lancet, we, 510-514. Wilson, Grams. S., and you will Atkinson, J. D. (1945). Lancet, i, 647-649.
Genetic Studies inside the Small-organisms DAVID Good. HOPWOOD John Znnes Institute, Norwikh, The united kingdomt I. Addition . 11. Segregation because Proof Simple Genetic Handle . An effective. The new hereditary method to biology . B. This new identification out of segregation . 111. The cornerstone of Genetic Mapping . B. New sequencing out of loci on a linkage chart: multi-basis crosses C. Linkagegroups . D. Genetic okay-build . Elizabeth. Deletion mapping . IV. Useful Hereditary Evaluation . A good. Popularity examination . Bplementation evaluating . C. Epistasis . V. Genetic Research within the Eukaryotic Microbes . An effective. Standard factors . step one. 2. Tetrad research . B. Hereditary study in particular bacteria 1. Aspergillus nidulans . . dos. Aspergillus niger or any other “imperfect” fungus step 3. Neurospora crassa . 4. Almost every other ascomycetes . 5. Yeasts . six. Filamentous basidiomycetes . seven. Ustilago . 8. Chlamydomonas reinhardii . 9. Ciliates . 10. Slime moulds VI. Hereditary Study inside the Prokaryotes . A great. General factors . 1. Virility types and conjugational mapping . dos. Transduction and you can co-transduction . step three. Transformation and you can co-conversion process cuatro. Non-choosy research .
fifty 51 57 61 61 65 66 69 69 73 75 77 78 80 81 81 83 84 91 94
Genetic analysis particularly bacteria step one. Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhimurium or any other Enteric germs . 2. Pseudomonas aeruginosa and you will Ps. putida . 3. Bacillus subtilis 4. Streptmyces coelicolor and other actinomycetes . 5. Most other germs C. Specialized mapping procedures separate away from recombination VII. Hereditary Analysis in the Viruses An effective. General considerations . step one. Sorts of viral genomes 2. Bells and whistles of virus genes B. Genetic investigation in particular worms step 1. Bacteriophages 2. Animal worms 3. Bush worms VIII. Concluding Feedback Records .
Najnowsze komentarze